Back to Top | Home | Index | Contact Us
Site Index

Acupuncture Shown to Relieve Migraines

Alternative treatment—even when fake—as effective as medical drugs

LONDON – Acupuncture, one of the most popular complementary treatments, works as well as standard drugs for migraines, German researchers said in early March.
They compared the effects of real and fake acupuncture with drug treatments for migraine and found all equally effective.

“The main finding is that Chinese acupuncture is as effective as drug treatment for the prophylaxis of migraine,” said Hans-Christoph Diener, a neurologist at the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. “Secondly, sham acupuncture is as effective as traditional Chinese acupuncture,” he told reporters.

All of the more than 900 patients who had been randomly selected to receive Chinese acupuncture, sham acupuncture or drugs reported similar improvements and reductions in the number of migraine-free days. “This tells us that Chinese acupuncture is not a very specific treatment,” said Diener.

Traditional Chinese acupuncture involves inserting fine needles at specific energy meridians of the body to reduce pain. In the so-called sham procedure, the needles were put in places that were not traditional acupuncture points. The ancient Chinese therapy has been shown to relieve nausea, stress, and arthritis pain in the knee and pelvic pain during pregnancy.

“What we showed is that acupuncture is effective but we need more research to find out the biological effect behind it,” added Diener, who reported his findings in The Lancet Neurology journal. Migraine affects about 15 percent of people in Britain alone. Symptoms can include intense throbbing on one side of the head, distorted vision, nausea or vomiting and raised sensitivity to light, sounds and smells.

An attack can last up to three days and prevent the sufferer from carrying out normal, everyday activities. Although anyone can get a migraine, it is most common between the ages of 20 and 50 and most sufferers are women. Over-the-counter and prescription drugs can help to relieve the pain and reduce inflammation. Many patients also try other therapies such as acupressure, homeopathy, osteopathy and physiotherapy.

“The most important result is that all three treatments were effective and that improvement in the number of migraine days was closely similar in all treatment groups,” Diener said in the study. “The decision whether acupuncture should be used in migraine prevention remains with the treating physician,” he added.


Driving under the influence of sleeping pills

Ambien among top 10 drugs found in impaired drivers

There’s a growing hazard on the roadway, the kind of motorist who smashes into parked cars, plows over sidewalks and drives in the wrong direction, all while oblivious to the destruction left behind. These drivers aren’t drunk or stoned — they’re under the influence of Ambien, the nation’s most popular prescription sleeping pill.

Ambien is regularly popping up as a factor in traffic arrests, sometimes involving drivers who don’t even remember getting behind the wheel, according to a report in The New York Times in early March.

In some state toxicology laboratories, Ambien shows up in the top 10 list of drugs found in impaired drivers. In Wisconsin, Ambien was detected in the bloodstreams of 187 arrested drivers from 1999 to 2004, the newspaper reported. As more insomniacs turn to the drug — there were 26.5 million prescriptions filled last year in the United States — Ambien-related arrests and accidents are expected to rise.

In Washington State, for example, officials counted 78 impaired-driving arrests in which Ambien was a factor last year, up from 56 in 2004. Some of Washington’s zombie-like drivers said they took the sleeping pill while behind the wheel so that it would kick in by bedtime. “Wow, that’s a really bad idea,” said sleep specialist Dr. Brooke Judd, an assistant professor of medicine and psychiatry at Dartmouth Medical School. “These newer sleep medications have a rapid onset so people can get to sleep quickly. You shouldn’t take them until you are really ready to go to bed.”

Judd also warns sleeping-pill users to get at least eight hours of shut-eye. That’s how long the sedative effect can last. An early-riser who hits the road might still be too groggy to drive, she said. Several cases also involved drivers using alcohol with Ambien — a combination that magnifies the drowsy effects of the drug.

A spokeswoman for the Food & Drug Administration told the newspaper that the agency is aware of reports of people driving while sleepwalking, but said the drug’s current label warnings, which say it should not be used with alcohol and in some cases could cause sleepwalking or hallucinations, were adequate. Users are advised not to drive or operate machinery while taking the drug.

The pills, intended to help short-term insomnia, have been on the market for 13 years and are said to be safe, according to Ambien’s maker, Sanofi-Aventis. But there are reports of “hangover” effects such as grogginess as well as some risks of abuse and dependence. Some patients have also reported an amnesia effect where they may sleepwalk, or sleeptalk without remembering it.

Laura J. Liddicoat, the forensic toxicology supervisor at Wisconsin’s state laboratory, presented six cases of Ambien drivers at a meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Scientists, including a man who crashed into two cars and drove over a curb. This was all news to him when confronted by the police.


Skip the sushi
- it may be bad for you

Mercury levels dangerously high in some fish, California group warns

LOS ANGELES – Sushi is more popular than ever before but eating it “has become the new Russian roulette” in terms of safety, a group campaigning against mercury in fish said in early March. Eli Saddler of gotmercury.org, a campaign of California-based Sea Turtle Restoration Project, went to six top sushi restaurants in Los Angeles to test mercury levels in the fish they serve.

“The level of mercury in tuna these restaurants serve is so high they should be keeping this food off their lists,” Saddler said. “Eating sushi has become the new Russian roulette.” Gotmercury.org proposes to take the study to various cities across the United States and educate sushi consumers on the risks of mercury intake, which can permanently damage the nervous system in fetuses and may cause temporary memory loss in adults.

Tuna samples from six popular sushi restaurants in Los Angeles were taken to a Southern California lab for testing. They returned an average mercury level of 0.721 parts per million, about 88 percent higher than the reported Food and Drug Administration level of 0.383 ppm for all fresh and frozen tuna. A couple of samples had mercury levels the FDA has declared ”unsafe for anyone to eat,” Saddler said. Big-eyed tuna and blue and yellow-finned tuna are the most popular varieties used in sushi restaurants. Older and bigger fish are considered best suited for sushi but Saddler said it was not widely known that fish with longer lives carry more mercury than others.

Studies show seafood like shrimp and salmon with short life spans pose almost no risk of carrying mercury. Nobi Kusuhara, owner of Sushi Sasabune in Los Angeles said even though the mercury level in the samples was higher than he expected, sushi is still healthy to eat. “Even in Japan we have warnings out like FDA has issued here,” Kusuhara said. “As long as restaurants warn pregnant women and people to eat smaller fish, it is definitely safer and healthier than beef or chicken.”

Businesses with more than 10 employees are bound under California law to post a mercury-in-seafood warning if they serve or sell any seafood. But Saddler said that, of the six restaurants checked, only one had an explicit sign posted on the door. “There are cheap and easy ways to test fish, so it should be done in the United States to protect sushi consumers,” Saddler said.


 

SKIP THE WHOLE MILK. PASS ON SODA.
DRINK BEER?


Nutrition experts stir controversy with new beverage guidelines

Some prominent nutrition experts put out new guidelines in March urging Americans to cut back on calorie-rich sodas while allowing more leeway for alcohol and lots of room for tea and coffee – up to 40 ounces a day.

That’s more than three tall cups at Starbucks, although that might bust suggested limits on caffeine. They also allow men three times as much beer as sugary soda. The report was paid for by the corporate parent of Lipton Tea, which is now using the scientists’ advice to advertise tea’s benefits.

The nutritionists say they didn’t know the extent of Lipton’s marketing campaign, and the company didn’t play a role in the recommendations, which generally urge people to drink more water. But beverage industry spokesmen and other nutritionists found fault with several of the guidelines. For example, whole milk is out, but moderate alcohol is OK.

In fact, the scientists say men can drink as much as 24 ounces of beer a day – more than the 16 ounces of low-fat milk or soy drinks they suggest, and three times their recommended limit for fruit juice. The beverage industry also seized on the accompanying marketing campaign by Lipton, a part of Unilever Health Institute, which gave about $40,000 to finance the report. The company plans full-page ads in USA Today featuring the guidelines with a coupon for $2 off tea.

Among the scientists who wrote the guidelines is Dr. Walter Willett, chairman of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health and a widely quoted expert on numerous nutritional topics. He said he was unaware of the details of the marketing effort and wished it had not included such blatant promotion. “This was sort of a new experience,” he said of working with a private sponsor, whose $4,000 share of the fees he turned over to charity. Willett said the company had no role in what the scientists recommended.

“This was done with complete freedom to come to whatever conclusions we came to,” he said. The guidelines were published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. In general, they urge Americans to drink water and limit both sugar-sweetened and naturally sweetened drinks. Unsweetened tea and coffee are seen as acceptable substitutes for water.

Americans should limit beverages to 10 percent to 14 percent of their total calories — half what they comprise now, the group advised. The panel of six scientists was assembled by Barry Popkin at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, a longtime advocate of curbs on soda. He said he did so because federal dietary guidelines, including the food pyramid, focus on food and miss a significant contributor of calories.

One of every five calories in the average American’s diet is liquid, something that doesn’t produce the sense of fullness that food does. The portion of daily calories coming from sugar-sweetened drinks has roughly doubled over two decades, contributing to the nation’s obesity problem, the report contends.


“We were quite dissatisfied” that federal guidelines and other advice focus on foods and general topics like dairy products, but don’t spell out how much people should consume of each type of beverage, Popkin said. In their guidelines, the nutritionists recommend 20 to 50 ounces of water a day. If other beverages are preferred, they recommend these daily limits for adults:

• Unsweetened tea or coffee, up to 40 ounces.
• Low-fat or skim milk and soy beverages, up to 16 ounces.
• Diet soda and other non-caloric sweet drinks, up to 32 ounces.
• Beverages with some nutrients, such as juice, up to 8 ounces.
• Alcoholic beverages, one drink a day for women and two for men. A drink equals 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine, 1.5 ounces spirits.
• Sugar-sweetened drinks like soda, no more than 8 ounces. (Standard soft drink cans are 12 ounces.)

Forego the fruit smoothies, too.
“Fruit smoothies are usually high-calorie versions of fruit drinks and, therefore, are not recommended,” the report says. Likewise for whole milk, which contains high amounts of fat.

Besides Popkin and Willett, other members of the group were Dr. George Bray of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, La.; Balz Frei, an Oregon State University biochemist; Dr. Benjamin Caballero, an obesity researcher at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; and Lawrence E. Armstrong, a physiologist at the University of Connecticut. Frei is a scientific adviser to Unilever.

The American Beverage Association says the report “has many factual shortcomings that are at odds with the USDA Dietary Guidelines — including the misguided suggestion that it’s healthier to drink more alcohol than sweetened beverages and, in some scenarios, drink more tea than water.” “It also has a minuscule role for skim milk or low-fat milk in the diet,” the association’s statement says. “And there is no credible scientific rationale for limiting diet soft drinks to four servings per day.” Lisa Kadic, a dietitian and longtime consultant to the food and beverage industry, took issue with the report’s contention that studies suggest some alcohol in moderation has health benefits. “It did look like alcohol was being positioned as a better choice than (non-diet) soft drinks,” she said.

While many studies have suggested some benefits from moderate alcohol, such advice has long been contentious because of alcohol’s risks. An expert on nutrition and food policy who had no role in the report, New York University biologist Marion Nestle, said the panel’s recommendations generally make good sense. “If I were advising someone to lose weight, I’d start with soft drinks and juice drinks. Get rid of them,” she said.


DEAR DR. MIRKIN:

Should I seek out the special margarines that contain sterols?

Researchers at McGill University in Canada report that eating plant sterols and exercising lowers cholesterol, blood pressure, body fat and weight, but you don’t have to eat special plant sterol margarine.You can get plenty of plant sterols in nuts, seeds, vegetables and beans. In this study, middle-aged men ate margarine containing sterols four times a day and used stair-stepping machines and stationary bicycles three times a week for eight weeks (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Dec 2005). Down went the total cholesterol, bad low-density cholesterol and triglycerides, and up went the good HDL cholesterol.

Fifty percent of deaths in North America are caused by heart attacks and strokes. Most people can prevent these catastrophes by exercising, eating lots of plants (fruits, vegetables, whole grains, beans and other seeds), avoiding smoking and maintaining a healthful weight.

This health info is provided with the permission of Dr. Gabe Mirkin, M.D. Dr. Mirkin has practiced medicine for more than 40 years and is board-certified in four specialties: Allergy and Immunology, Sports Medicine, Pediatrics and Pediatric Immunology. Visit www.drmirkin.com


French fry lovers may have higher diabetes risk

Potatoes trigger rapid surge in blood sugar that may damage cells

Holding that side of fries might help thwart Type 2 diabetes, new research suggests.
In a long-term study of nearly 85,000 U.S. women, researchers at Harvard University found that those with the highest potato intake had a modestly elevated risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.

The link was strongest among obese women, who are already at increased risk of the disease, suggesting that heavy potato consumption may pose a particular problem for them, the researchers point out. The findings are published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Though potatoes have healthful attributes, they also have a high glycemic index (GI) — meaning they cause a rapid, strong rise in blood sugar. Over time, these surges may damage the pancreatic cells that produce the hormone insulin, which is needed to metabolize blood sugar.

Overweight or sedentary adults may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of high-GI foods because they often have underlying insulin resistance – a precursor to diabetes in which body cells lose their sensitivity to insulin. So it would make sense for these individuals to lay off the french fries, Thomas L. Halton, the lead author of the new study, told reporters.

He and his colleagues found that women with the highest potato intake were 14 percent more likely than those with the lowest intake to develop diabetes over 20 years. And women who ate the most french fries, specifically, had a 21 percent greater risk of diabetes than those who ate the fewest.

Overall diet and other lifestyle habits did not explain the link, and potatoes seemed to be more problematic when a woman ate them instead of whole grains. Whole grains – as well as many high-fiber vegetables, fruits and legumes – have a lower GI than potatoes and white-flour products. So eating those foods in place of potatoes, Halton’s team concludes, could potentially cut diabetes risk.


This Month’s “Superfood”
Salmon

It is an excellent source of high-quality protein; contains all essential amino acids, vitamins A, D, B6 and B2, as well as niacin, riboflavin, calcium, iron, zinc, magnesium and phosphorus in appreciable amounts. Salmon’s fats are predominantly unsaturated; furthermore, evidence indicates these unsaturated fats help avoid development of artery disease. Recent studies suggest salmon be consumed by adults up to four times a week.

BAKED SALMON FILLETS DIJON
Even non-salmon lovers will enjoy this dish!

INGREDIENTS:
4 (4 oz) salmon fillets
3 Tbsp prepared Dijon-style mustard
Salt & pepper to taste
1/4 cup Italian-style dry bread crumbs
1/4 cup butter, melted

TO MAKE:
Preheat oven to 400º. Line a shallow baking pan with aluminum foil.
Place salmon skin-side down on foil. Spread a thin layer of mustard on the top of each fillet, and season with salt and pepper. Top with bread crumbs, then drizzle with melted butter. Bake in a preheated oven for 15 minutes, or until salmon flakes easily with a fork. Makes four servings.

Nutrition Info Per Serving: Calories 332; Total Fat 22.3g; Cholesterol 107mg; Sodium 658mg; Total Carbs 6.6g; Dietary Fiber 0.5g; Protein 25.8g